7 Key Insights from the SBL June 2024 Examiner’s Report to Boost Your Success in 2025 Exam
Author: GlobalAPC (ACCA SBL Online Course Provider)
The ACCA Strategic Business Leader exam is not just about knowledge. It also tests how you apply skills in real-world business scenarios. The examiner’s report for the June 2024 sitting shows important insights. It highlights common pitfalls and areas of strength. If you understand these insights, you can avoid costly errors. You can also improve your exam strategy. This blog summarizes 7 key lessons that help you prepare better and aim for better results.
A common issue in the June 2024 report is that many candidates copy text from exhibits or pre-seen materials. They do not explain why that information matters. This leads to lost marks. The examiner notes that repeating text from the case does not add value if you do not analyze it.
Task 1a asked candidates to assess how a joint venture would affect PVS’s brand. Many candidates mentioned Best4Pets' cost-leadership strategy. Few explained how this differs from PVS’s quality focus or how it might affect brand reputation.
Pro Tip: For each point you take from an exhibit, add at least one sentence of analysis. Show why it matters to the task.
The examiner’s report shows that some candidates answer questions they prefer instead of the actual questions asked. This wastes marks. The answers might be correct in a general sense, but they do not address the set requirements.
Task 2a asked about CSR's impact on stakeholders. Many candidates wrote broad essays on CSR. They did not focus on how CSR affects PVS’s specific stakeholders.
Pro Tip: Summarize the question in your own words. Check that you stay on topic.
ACCA assigns 20% of SBL marks to professional skills. Many candidates focus only on technical knowledge. The report says you must show communication, skepticism, analysis, and commercial awareness in your responses.
Task 1b asked about new technology and possible drawbacks, including ethical issues. Candidates who left out ethical concerns lost professional skills marks.
Pro Tip: Practice writing short, structured responses under timed conditions. This develops a professional tone and layout.
Good time management can decide your pass or fail. Many candidates finished all three tasks, but their answers got weaker near the end. The examiner saw that poor planning caused rushed answers with little depth.
Some candidates spent too much time on Task 1. They had less time for Task 3. This caused incomplete work.
Pro Tip: Keep 5–10 minutes at the end to review your answers. That helps you refine clarity and detail.
The report shows that well-structured and planned answers often get better marks. Candidates who spent time organizing their thoughts produced more balanced responses.
Top-scoring answers in Task 1a had a brief outline of key points. They covered all aspects of the joint venture’s impact on PVS’s brand.
Pro Tip: Copy the task wording into your answer area. Write your response under each part. This keeps you aligned with the question.
Pre-seen materials give context, but they should not dominate your answer. Some candidates pasted entire sections of pre-seen text. They missed chances to analyze new exhibit data.
In Task 1a, some candidates only repeated PVS’s differentiation strategy. They did not connect it with Best4Pets’ operations.
Some candidates wrote broad answers about CSR. They did not connect these ideas to specific stakeholders. Their answers lacked depth.
Task 2a asked for an analysis of CSR’s impact on different stakeholders. Many candidates gave generic answers. They did not address shareholders, employees, or regulators.
Original Report Can be Found HERE
Categories: : Strategic Business Leader (SBL)